Martin Luther King in campaigning in the North Essay

In 1966 Martin Luther King persistent to focus on dealing with the problems in the North specially Chicago. The problems that he encountered here were very unlike to those that he had had so much success with in the reciprocal ohm. Dealing with the economic and social segregation that he faced here proved difficult for several reasons.The problems facing blacks in the North, stemmed from a change over of different areas including education, employment, housing etc. Although King was able to identify the problems being faced in these areas, particularly housing, he put away largely relayed on the same tactics that he and the Southern Christian leading Conference (SCLC) had used in the South. However, the mayor of Chicago (Daley) would avoid making a hostile repartee such as that of Bull Connor in Birmingham. The authorities here were more subtle to avoid gaining the perplexity of the media e.g. the police would avoid using brutality and Daley even blamed abandon for social d ecay*.This prevented the apparent movement from gaining as much publicity and hold up as in previous years. King also tested to come to some sort of agreement with Daley regarding housing. However, Daley was reluctant to do so fearing the loss of votes of the white running(a) class. Actions such as this added to the anger that blacks in Chicago felt towards the white authorities and increased their unwillingness to co-operate. Both Mayor Daleys refusal to help and Kings disorganisation when planning the Chicago fight played an important role in its failure.Chicago suffered more from problems in racial division than new(prenominal) cities in the North, and so perhaps it was non a good starting point for the campaign here. Locals would sometimes blame blacks for inciting race riots and these divisions were illustrated by the marches organised by the SCLC in 1966, which ended in violence from mobs. * *In Chicago most blacks lived in ghettoes to the south of the city. Therefore i t appears reasonable that these people often anchor it difficult to relate to Martin Luther King and his middle class background. The SCLC had never had much grass roots support unlike other organisations, such as the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNNC). Although in the South this hadstill allowed them to have success, in Chicago most blacks were working class and looking for improvements in housing, less exiguity and some overall change brought about by an end to de positiono segregation. However, in the South the need for change had been more political- an end to de jure segregation.Given these differences, many northern blacks felt that Kings non-violent philosophy did not represent their views. It would be difficult to change these attitudes here, perhaps as a forget of poverty, the amount of large number warfare and crime was much higher than in the South. Change would undoubtedly take time- more than the hardly a(prenominal) months that the SCLC had planned for the campaign to last. There were quite clear social divisions between black communities in the South and North. One of the most important examples of this is that the churches in the North were not as successful at organising their corporation as churches in the South had been. This was partly due to a lack of co-operation, and partly due to the fact that the Christian faith was much stronger in the South. It was at this point that many blacks were beginning to join alternate(a) black power groups.Overall it appears that King underestimated the differences between the North and the South and the divisions that were evident amongst the black community. He was unfamiliar with the attitudes of those in the North and did not make an accurate assessment of the situation. As a result of this the tactics employed by the SCLC were not as successful as originally hoped.* http//www.revision-notes.co.uk/revision/59.html** http//www.reportingcivilrights.org/